tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1329673482293813997.post5692772899966227972..comments2009-03-03T11:39:20.872ZAndreas Persbohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09981722250431400376noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1329673482293813997.post-35868492389096915892009-03-03T02:46:00.000Z2009-03-03T02:46:00.000ZScott Ritter contends that Iran's domesticly produced U308 is contaminated with molybdenum; that Iran doesn't possess the technology to remove it; that domestically sourced UF6 would destroy the cascade if they ever tried to feed it in. Is this still the case, or have they developed the technology now to remove the contaminant?<BR/><BR/>Also, 90+% enrichment seems to be a lot higher goal than the current 3.5% - it seems that given how long its taken them to get to this point, that it would take much longer to get to highly enriched uranium?Andrewhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05999116057072499260noreply@blogger.com